Common Sense and the Fifth Amendment
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
A fifth amendment to the intestine's constitution
Rad54 mutant stays rooted to the spot O nly a small proportion of the proteins that gather around a DNA double-strand break are actively involved in repairing the damage, Agarwal et al. suggest. Double-strand breaks are repaired by homologous recombination, in which missing sections of DNA are replaced using sister chromatids as undamaged templates. Rad51 is the central catalyst of this process...
متن کاملEmerging neurotechnologies for lie detection and the fifth amendment.
The article examines the legal implications and advantages of emerging Neurotechnological Lie Detection (NTLD). The self-incrimination clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was taken into account, including its scope over NTLD. Key information about the reliability and privacy issues of NTLD is further presented. Comments Postprint version. Published in American Journal of Law ...
متن کاملCommon Sense about Common Decency: Promoting a New Standard for Guard-on-inmate Sexual Abuse under the Eighth Amendment
Although Washington alleges that he was subjected to an offensive and unwanted touching [by a male guard who snuck up behind him and groped his genitals, kissed him on the mouth despite resistance, and threatened oral sex], he alleges only momentary pain, “psychological injury,” embarrassment, humiliation, and fear. These de minimis injuries do not rise to the level of constitutional harms, and...
متن کاملCommon sense and "relevance"
Introduction The "relevance" logicians of North America and the "relevant" logicians of the Antipodes have long claimed that their logical systems are in better agreement with common sense than is classical logic. The present paper is a critical examination of such claims. Though it is part of an on-going debate between classical and relevantistic logicians, I have tried to keep my discussion o...
متن کاملCommon Sense and Nonsense
The irrepressible Bernard E. Rollin has written a lively, provocative, and scholarly book on several pivotal bioethical issues in nonhuman animal research. Professor Rollin of Colorado State University asksand answers whether nonhuman animals think, feel, and suffer. Rollin asks whether the prevailing scientific justification for banning nonhuman animals is based on rational assessment of the i...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Stanford Law Review
سال: 1958
ISSN: 0038-9765
DOI: 10.2307/1226711